FAQ

A one-person software company built around a governed agentic delivery system. AI agents do the construction inside rules I define up front, those rules check the work continuously, and I stay accountable for what comes out. It's aimed at software that has to be correct and has to prove it.

Quality as code means the standards for a project (acceptance criteria, security and compliance constraints, review rules) are written as checks the work has to pass. Audit-grade means the work leaves a record: what was decided, which check it cleared, and how it traces back to the requirement behind it. Together they let the result stand up to scrutiny later.

No. The agents work inside the rules I set for the job, and they stop and escalate when something's ambiguous or their own checks can't agree. I review what ships and I'm accountable for it. The aim is to put the human where judgment is needed and let the system handle the rest.

In the places that need judgment: shaping the idea, getting the requirements right, refining the method, and deciding whether the outcome is good. I review at the level of the test plan and the method rather than every line. The system pulls me in when there's a real decision, or when gap analysis, code analysis, BDD, and TDD can't agree. That usually means a requirement was wrong.

The requirements. Most teams know what they think they want, but not where the holes are: the contradictions and missing cases that don't show up until release is close and fixing them is expensive. Surfacing those early, before anything is built, is where experience earns its keep. It's the part I care most about.

Early and pre-revenue, with no outside clients yet. The system works but it's young. I'm proving it on a build of my own before I run anyone else's work through it. I'm not taking on customers right now. This site is here to show how I think.

No. The work isn't open, and there's nothing to browse or demo. The clearest look at the approach is the write-up of how the agent teams work.

Two decades of reliability, release and platform engineering in high-stakes, Azure and Microsoft-centric environments, plus a long-standing habit of treating quality as something you build into the process. More on that on the About page.